|Year : 2021 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 164-168
Revised atlanta classification for acute pancreatitis – A pictorial depiction
Ashwin Raghavendra Athikayula1, Ajith Vettuparambil2, Ravindran Chirukandath3
1 Department of Radio Diagnosis, Kamineni Institute of Medical Sciences, Narketpally, Telangana, India
2 Department of General Surgery, DM Wayanad Institute of Medical Sciences, Wayanad, Kerala, India
3 Department of General Surgery, Government Medical College, Thrissur, Kerala, India
|Date of Submission||10-Jun-2021|
|Date of Decision||04-Sep-2021|
|Date of Acceptance||06-Sep-2021|
|Date of Web Publication||15-Nov-2021|
Dr. Ajith Vettuparambil
Department of General Surgery, DM Wayanad Institute of Medical Sciences, Wayanad - 673 577, Kerala
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Introduction: There are various classifications for clinical presentation of acute pancreatitis. However, most of them are not standardised. Aims and Objectives: The revised Atlanta classification is designed to precisely describe patients with acute pancreatitis, standardise terminology across specialties and help in treatment planning. Materials and Methods: The revised Atlanta classification was analysed to describe the features of acute pancreatitis. Results: Acute pancreatitis is now divided into two distinct subtypes: necrotising pancreatitis and interstitial oedematous pancreatitis (IEP). Use of the terms such as acute pseudocyst and pancreatic abscess is currently being discouraged. Four distinct collection subtypes are identified based on the presence of pancreatic necrosis and the time elapsed since the onset of pancreatitis which include acute peripancreatic fluid collections, pseudocysts, acute necrotic collections (ANCs) and walled-off necrosis (WON). Conclusions: The updates in classification and terminology of local complications have clarified confusing terms from the original Atlanta classification. In this article, we report an image-rich guide to the revised Atlanta classification system to improve stratification of the patients both for clinical care and research.
Keywords: Acute pancreatitis, interstitial oedematous pancreatitis, necrotising pancreatitis, the revised Atlanta classification
|How to cite this article:|
Athikayula AR, Vettuparambil A, Chirukandath R. Revised atlanta classification for acute pancreatitis – A pictorial depiction. Kerala Surg J 2021;27:164-8
|How to cite this URL:|
Athikayula AR, Vettuparambil A, Chirukandath R. Revised atlanta classification for acute pancreatitis – A pictorial depiction. Kerala Surg J [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Nov 30];27:164-8. Available from: http://www.keralasurgj.com/text.asp?2021/27/2/164/330396
| Introduction|| |
The 1992 original Atlanta classification for AP created consensus-based terminology for types, severity and complications of AP. Although the Atlanta classiﬁcation has been useful, some of the deﬁnitions have been proven to be ambiguous. A better understanding of the pathophysiology of organ failure and necrotising pancreatitis and their outcomes, as well as improved diagnostic imaging, has made it necessary to revise the Atlanta classiﬁcation. The revised Atlanta classification (RAC) was established in 2012 to clarify terminology and more specifically categorise AP and its complications. This consensus classiﬁcation deﬁnes criteria for the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis, differentiates the types of acute pancreatitis (interstitial oedematous pancreatitis [IEP] and necrotising pancreatitis), classiﬁes the severity of acute pancreatitis into three categories and deﬁnes the morphology seen on imaging of pancreatic and peripancreatic collections that arise as complications., This article has been prepared based on our experiences in classifying the patients presenting with acute pancreatitis according to the revised Atlanta system.
| Computed Tomography Presentation of Different Stages of Acute Pancreatitis|| |
We have used the revised deﬁnitions of morphological features of acute pancreatitis.
Interstitial oedematous pancreatitis
It is acute inﬂammation of the pancreatic parenchyma and peripancreatic tissues but without recognisable tissue necrosis. The contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) criteria are pancreatic parenchyma enhancement by intravenous contrast agent and no ﬁndings of pancreatic and peripancreatic necrosis. We present a 45-year-old male with acute interstitial oedematous pancreatitis (IEP). CECT shows a mild enlargement of the body and tail of the pancreas with homogeneous enhancement [Figure 1].
|Figure 1: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the patient with interstitial oedematous pancreatitis. Shows mild enlargement of body and tail of the pancreas (white arrow) with homogeneous enhancement. There is peripancreatic fluid collection and inflammation in the form of fat stranding (black arrow)|
Click here to view
It is an inﬂammation associated with pancreatic parenchymal necrosis and/or peripancreatic necrosis. CECT criteria are lack of pancreatic parenchymal enhancement by intravenous contrast agent and/or presence of ﬁndings of peripancreatic necrosis (see below – ANC and walled-off necrosis [WON]). We present three cases. First is a 50-year-old male with acute necrotising pancreatitis with acute necrotic collection (ANC). CECT shows diffuse non-enhancement of the pancreas. Pancreatic parenchyma is replaced by non-enhancing necrotic components [Figure 2].
|Figure 2: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the patient with acute necrotising pancreatitis shows pancreatic parenchyma replaced by non-enhancing necrotic components (white arrow) and peripancreatic heterogeneous collection (black arrow). Small fluid collection and inflammation noted in the left perinephric space and right anterior pararenal space|
Click here to view
Second is a 42-year-old male with acute necrotising pancreatitis in pancreatic and peripancreatic areas. CECT findings are shown in [Figure 3].
|Figure 3: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the patient with acute necrotising pancreatitis. Note heterogeneous areas of non-enhancement in tail of the pancreas (black arrow) and non-enhancing and non-encapsulated collection in the retroperitoneum and lesser sac (white arrow)|
Click here to view
Third is a 55-year-old male patient with pancreatic and peripancreatic necrosis. The CT scan shows ANC with acute necrotising pancreatitis [Figure 4].
|Figure 4: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography showing pancreatic and peripancreatic necrosis. Note non-enhancement of pancreas and replacement of pancreatic tissue with heterogeneous collection (black arrow) with areas of fat within. The collection is seen extending in the peripancreatic regions as well (white arrow)|
Click here to view
Acute peripancreatic fluid collection
It is peripancreatic ﬂuid associated with interstitial oedematous pancreatitis with no associated peripancreatic necrosis. This term applies only to areas of peripancreatic ﬂuid seen within the ﬁrst 4 weeks after onset of interstitial oedematous pancreatitis and without the features of a pseudocyst. The CECT criteria include occurrence in the setting of interstitial oedematous pancreatitis, homogeneous collection with ﬂuid density conﬁned by normal peripancreatic fascial planes and no deﬁnable wall encapsulating the collection adjacent to the pancreas (no intrapancreatic extension). We present a case of acute peripancreatic fluid collection in a 39-year-old male. The body of pancreas appears oedematous. There is non-encapsulated homogeneous fluid collection in the peripancreatic region [Figure 5].
|Figure 5: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography picture of acute peripancreatic fluid collection. The body of pancreas appears oedematous (black arrow) and non-encapsulated homogeneous fluid collection in the peri-pancreatic region is noted, predominantly extending anterior to the pancreas (white arrow). Inflammatory changes are noted surrounding the fluid collection|
Click here to view
It is an encapsulated collection of ﬂuid with a well-deﬁned inﬂammatory wall outside the pancreas with minimal or no necrosis. This entity usually occurs 4 weeks after the onset of interstitial oedematous pancreatitis. CECT criteria include well-circumscribed, usually round or oval, homogeneous ﬂuid density, no non-liquid component, well-deﬁned wall, that is, completely encapsulated. Maturation usually requires >4 weeks from the onset of acute interstitial oedematous pancreatitis.
We present a 30-year-old male with pseudocyst of more than 4 weeks duration following acute pancreatitis. CT showed acute oedematous interstitial pancreatitis with pseudocyst [Figure 6].
|Figure 6: Computed tomography scan showing a well-defined homogeneous encapsulated collection with smooth margins anterior and inferior to head of the pancreas with no gas pockets within indicating a sterile pseudocyst (black arrow)|
Click here to view
Acute necrotic collection
It is a collection containing variable necrosis that can involve the pancreatic parenchyma and/or the peripancreatic tissues. CECT criteria include occurring only in the setting of acute necrotising pancreatitis, heterogeneous and non-liquid density of varying degrees in different locations (some appear homogeneous early in their course) and no deﬁnable wall encapsulating the collection. Location is intrapancreatic and/or extrapancreatic.
We present two cases, first a 37-year-old male with acute necrotising pancreatitis of more than 4 weeks duration and sterile ANC. The head of pancreas shows non-enhancement and appears heterogeneous. Non-encapsulated peripancreatic heterogeneous collection with areas of fat noted with surrounding inflammatory changes suggestive of ANC [Figure 7].
|Figure 7: (a) (Axial view) and (b) (coronal view): Contrast-enhanced computed tomography of acute necrotic collection. The head of pancreas is non-enhancing and appears heterogeneous (black arrows). Non-encapsulated peripancreatic heterogeneous collection (white arrow in Figure 7a)|
Click here to view
The second is a 29-year-old male with infected acute necrotising pancreatitis of less than 4 weeks with infected acute necrotic intrapancreatic collection. The CT scan findings are shown in [Figure 8]a and [Figure 8]b.
|Figure 8: (a and b) Contrast-enhanced computed tomography picture of acute necrotising pancreatitis showing bulky pancreas with intrapancreatic heterogeneous collection with multiple pockets of gas within (black arrow). There is non-encapsulated peripancreatic heterogeneous collection with surrounding inflammatory changes noted in peripancreatic and right sub-hepatic space suggestive of acute necrotic collection (white arrow)|
Click here to view
It is a mature, encapsulated collection of pancreatic and/or peripancreatic necrosis that has developed a well-deﬁned inﬂammatory wall. WON usually occurs >4 weeks after onset of necrotising pancreatitis.
We present two cases: one is a 23-year-old male with acute necrotising pancreatitis of more than 4 weeks with sterile WON. Pancreas appears bulky and with heterogeneous enhancement [Figure 9].
|Figure 9: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography of acute necrotising pancreatitis with sterile walled-off necrosis. Pancreas appears bulky with heterogeneous enhancement. Encapsulated heterogeneous necrotic collection is noted in body and tail of the pancreas (black arrows)|
Click here to view
Second is a 37-year-old male with infected WON in acute necrotising pancreatitis. Second is a 37 year old male with infected WON in acute necrotising pancreatitis who had well encapsulated heterogeneous collection involving pancreatic and peripancreatic regions with pockets of gas [Figure 10].
|Figure 10: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography of acute necrotising pancreatitis and infected walled-off necrosis. Well-encapsulated heterogeneous collection involving pancreatic and peripancreatic regions with pockets of gas within surrounding inflammatory changes suggestive of walled-off necrosis with infection (black arrow)|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
The RAC provides a comprehensive classification of AP that enabled standardised reporting of research and communication between clinicians worldwide. It offers new data regarding aetiology, pathophysiology, severity and radiologic description of pancreatic and peripancreatic collections.
Acute pancreatitis can be subdivided into two types: IEP and necrotising pancreatitis. The clinical symptoms of IEP usually resolve within the ﬁfth week., About 5–10% of patients develop necrosis of the pancreatic parenchyma, the peripancreatic tissue or both. The impairment of pancreatic perfusion and signs of peripancreatic necrosis evolve over several days, which explains why an early CECT may underestimate the eventual extent of pancreatic and peripancreatic necrosis. The development of secondary infection in pancreatic necrosis is associated with increased morbidity and mortality.,,,,
Local complications are acute peripancreatic ﬂeri collection, pancreatic pseudocyst, ANC and WON., The morphologic features of acute pancreatitis are well delineated by high resolution, multi-detector CECT and form the basis of the new, more objective deﬁnitions for the local complications of acute pancreatitis., Exacerbation of pre-existing co-morbidity, such as coronary artery disease or chronic lung disease, precipitated by acute pancreatitis is deﬁned as a systemic complication. Organ failure is defined as a score of ≥2 using the Modified Marshall scoring system.
The classiﬁcation (RAC) deﬁnes three degrees of severity: mild acute pancreatitis, moderately severe acute pancreatitis and severe acute pancreatitis. Patients with mild acute pancreatitis usually do not require pancreatic imaging, and mortality is very rare. Moderately severe acute pancreatitis may resolve without intervention (as in transient organ failure or acute ﬂuid collection) or it may require prolonged specialist care (as in extensive sterile necrosis without organ failure). The mortality of moderately severe acute pancreatitis is far less than that of severe acute pancreatitis.,
| Conclusion|| |
The updates in classification and terminology of local complications have clarified confusing terms from the original Atlanta classification. In this article, we report an image-rich guide to the RAC system to improve stratification of the patients both for clinical care and research.
We acknowledge both Department of Radiodiagnosis and Department of General Surgery, Mysore Medical College and Research Institute, Mysore. We also acknowledge the help of Dr. Gilsa E S, Dr. Sharlet Shabu Pappachan and Akhil T Anil for completing this study.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Bradley EL 3rd
. A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, Ga, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg 1993;128:586-90.
Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG, et al
. Classification of acute pancreatitis-2012: Revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 2013;62:102-11.
Colvin SD, Smith EN, Morgan DE, Porter KK. Acute pancreatitis: An update on the revised Atlanta classification. Abdom Radiol 2019;45:1222-31.
Foster BR, Jensen KK, Bakis G, Shaaban AM, Coakley FV. Revised Atlanta classification for acute pancreatitis: A pictorial essay. Radiographics 2016;36:675-87.
Morgan DE. Imaging of acute pancreatitis and its complications. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008;6:1077-85.
Banks PA, Gerzof SG, Langevin RE, Silverman SG, Sica GT, Hughes MD. CT-guided aspiration of suspected pancreatic infection: Bacteriology and clinical outcome. Int J Pancreatol 1995;18:265-70.
Marshall JC, Cook DJ, Christou NV, Bernard GR, Sprung CL, Sibbald WJ. Multiple organ dysfunction score: A reliable descriptor of a complex clinical outcome. Crit Care Med 1995;23:1638-52.
Petrov MS, Windsor JA. Classification of the severity of acute pancreatitis: How many categories make sense? Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105:74-6.
Renner IG, Savage WT 3rd
, Pantoja JL, Renner VJ. Death due to acute pancreatitis. A retrospective analysis of 405 autopsy cases. Dig Dis Sci 1985;30:1005-18.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10]